Assess whether: How does one fairly and accurately indicate who has made what contributions towards the results and interpretations presented in your paper?Tags: Phd Thesis Introduction Word CountResearch Proposal Powerpoint PresentationLouisiana Pur Essay OutlineProject Management Online ToolsTerm Paper OnThesis Openhook UpdateSamuel Johnson Essay On EpitaphsOnline Magazine Business PlanTemplate For Research ProposalSketchbook Assignment
"Show them, don't just tell them…" Ideally, every result claimed in the text should be documented with data, usually data presented in tables or figures.
If there are no data provided to support a given statement of result or observation, consider adding more data, or deleting the unsupported "observation." Examine figure(s) or table(s) pertaining to the result(s).
This is a statement of something sufficiently interesting to motivate your reader to read the rest of the paper, it is an important/interesting scientific problem that your paper either solves or addresses.
You should draw the reader in and make them want to read the rest of the paper.
We are looking for a well-reasoned line of argument, from your initial question, compilation of relevant evidence, setting data in a general/universal context, and finally making a judgment based on your analysis.
Your thesis should be clearly written and in the format described below.
Therefore, you should construct your paper so that it can be understood by skimming, i.e., the conclusions, as written in your abstract, can be understood by study of the figures and captions.
The text fills out the details for the more interested reader.
In most circumstances, this is best accomplished by physically separating statements about new observations from statements about the meaning or significance of those observations.
Alternatively, this goal can be accomplished by careful use of phrases such as "I infer ..." vast bodies of geological literature became obsolete with the advent of plate tectonics; the papers that survived are those in which observations were presented in stand-alone fashion, unmuddied by whatever ideas the author might have had about the processes that caused the observed phenomena.