Tags: Research Paper 24 7Essay On Doing Community ServiceStudent Research PapersShort Essay About My FriendElie Wiesel Essay EthicsEssay On Responsible GovernmentWrite Dissertation FastDemocracy Vs Absolutism EssayBusiness Planning WorkshopPersonal Essays Are Different From Short Stories In That
After the first reading, attempt to ‘mirror’ the article by writing down, in detail, your understanding of the science.This tells the authors how you — the reader — have interpreted the aims, results and novelty of their research.
To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer).
In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and Java Script.
Editors do not expect you to be an expert in absolutely every aspect of the paper, although they also don’t want you to be a novice.
Be upfront and honest with the authors and the editor about which scientific aspects you will focus on in your review.
Papers published in these journals are expert-approved…and the most authoritative sources of information for college-level research papers.
Articles fromr publications, on the other hand (like magazines, newspapers or many sites on the Internet), are published with minimal editing (for spelling and grammar, perhaps; but, typically not for factual accuracy or intellectual integrity).While interesting to read, these articles aren’t sufficient to support research at an academic level.Authors’ names are given, and occasionally some biographical information, but rarely credentials (degrees, professional status, expertise).You've made enough progress and learned enough about nature that you think that your peers need to hear about it, and the publishers of the journal agree. The major hurdle for publishing a paper is peer review, when a (usually) anonymous member of your community (somebody who knows what they're talking about, hopefully) reads the draft of your paper and offers critiques.Now these critiques are usually guided by the editor and the publishing standards of the journal.We suggest that you perform three readings of a paper, concentrating on a different element each time.At every point, remember to classify your comments as major or minor flaws.Scientists do not receive enough peer-review training.To improve this situation, a small group of editors and I developed a peer-review workflow to guide reviewers in delivering useful and thorough analyses that can really help authors to improve their papers.It’s unlikely that it won’t be, but answering this question forces you to better understand the research and think about the paper’s mission: what it’s trying to achieve.Take particular note of the parts of the paper that your expertise speaks best to.