For example, how does the film represent high school cliques in a surprising or complex way? As we’ve just seen, a strong thesis statement crystallizes your paper's argument and, most importantly, . It goes beyond merely summarizing or describing to stake out an interpretation or position that’s not obvious, and others could challenge for good reasons.
How does the film reinforce stereotypes about high school groups and how does it undermine them? It’s also arguable in the literal sense that it can be , or supported through a thoughtful analysis of your sources.
Summarize for your reader how a scholar or group of scholars has approached your topic.
Introduce a theoretical source (possibly from another discipline) and explain how it helps you address this issue from a new and productive angle.
) What does this commonplace interpretation leave out, overlook, or under-emphasize? What larger questions does this paradox or contradiction raise for you and your readers? If your assignment asks you to do research, piggyback off another scholar's reserach.
Summarize for your reader another scholar’s argument about your topic, primary source, or case study and tell your reader why this claim is interesting.
You need a good thesis statement for your essay but are having trouble getting started. You’ve focused on a topic--high school cliques--which is a smart move because you’ve settled on one of many possible angles.
You may have heard that your thesis needs to be specific and arguable, but still wonder what this really means. Imagine you’re writing about John Hughes’s film is a romantic comedy about high school cliques. But the claim is weak because it’s not yet arguable.
Intelligent people would generally agree with this statement—so there’s no real “news” for your reader.
You want your thesis to say something surprising and debatable. It challenges an obvious interpretation of the movie (that it just reinforces stereotypes), offering a new and more complex reading in its place.