Your approach/methods should be carefully designed to come to closure.
Your results should be clearly defined and discussed in the context of your topic. You should place your analysis in a broader context, and highlight the implications (regional, global, etc.) of your work.
You should then go on to explain why more work was necessary (your work, of course.) Quarantine your observations from your interpretations.
The writer must make it crystal clear to the reader which statements are observation and which are interpretation.
This is a statement of something sufficiently interesting to motivate your reader to read the rest of the paper, it is an important/interesting scientific problem that your paper either solves or addresses.
You should draw the reader in and make them want to read the rest of the paper.We are looking for a well-reasoned line of argument, from your initial question, compilation of relevant evidence, setting data in a general/universal context, and finally making a judgment based on your analysis.Your thesis should be clearly written and in the format described below.In most circumstances, this is best accomplished by physically separating statements about new observations from statements about the meaning or significance of those observations.Alternatively, this goal can be accomplished by careful use of phrases such as "I infer ..." vast bodies of geological literature became obsolete with the advent of plate tectonics; the papers that survived are those in which observations were presented in stand-alone fashion, unmuddied by whatever ideas the author might have had about the processes that caused the observed phenomena.This section should be rich in references to similar work and background needed to interpret results.However, interpretation/discussion section(s) are often too long and verbose.Break up the section into logical segments by using subheads. We want you to answer a scientific question or hypothesis.We would like you to gather evidence -- from various sources -- to allow you to make interpretations and judgments. The list should include a short title for each figure but not the whole caption. The list should include a short title for each table but not the whole caption.You can't write a good introduction until you know what the body of the paper says.