Racial republicanism was not a top priority, but the visualizations of injustice made great metaphors. _____________________________________________________________________________________ Marixa Lasso, Myths of Harmony: Race and Republicanism during the Age of Revolution, Colombia 1795-1831, (Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press, 2007), 62. Lord of the Flies is an allegorical novel, which means that Golding conveys many of his main ideas and themes through symbolic characters and objects.
Bolívar sought the help of the region’s large pardo population to achieve independence and supported racial mixing only to promote national unity in the struggle for independence.
In truth, un-mixed blacks were left on the periphery with no real plans to incorporate them in the social or political structure of the Republic.
Among all the characters, only Simon seems to possess anything like a natural, innate goodness.
As the boys on the island progress from well-behaved, orderly children longing for rescue to cruel, bloodthirsty hunters who have no desire to return to civilization, they naturally lose the sense of innocence that they possessed at the beginning of the novel.
Throughout the novel, Golding associates the instinct of civilization with good and the instinct of savagery with evil.
Piggy, for instance, has no savage feelings, while Roger seems barely capable of comprehending the rules of civilization.
Bolívar makes extensive use of racially targeted language in order to demonstrate the extent of creole separation from Spain and to emphasize the need for regional independence.
He declared that they—the people of the region—“are not Europeans; we are not Indians.
Generally, however, Golding implies that the instinct of savagery is far more primal and fundamental to the human psyche than the instinct of civilization.
Golding sees moral behavior, in many cases, as something that civilization forces upon the individual rather than a natural expression of human individuality.