Opponents of same sex marriage may argue that it is important for children to have a father and mother.They may say that for children to have a good balance in their upbringing, they should be influenced by a father and a mother in their developmental years.
Opponents of same sex marriage may argue that it is important for children to have a father and mother.They may say that for children to have a good balance in their upbringing, they should be influenced by a father and a mother in their developmental years.Tags: How Do You Cite A Master'S ThesisSara Olibet ThesisTomosynthesis Femoral HeadEssays On CartelsThesis Body_ClassesCounter Terrorism EssayLord Of The Flies Theme Essay OutlineBgsu Dissertation Patrick Vrooman
To them, marriage is a religious and traditional commitment and ceremony that is held very sacred by people.
They contend that there is need to do everything possible to preserve marriage because as an institution, it has been degrading slowly over time.
The United Kingdom, Spain, France, Argentina, the Netherlands, and recently the United States are some of the countries that have legalized it (Winter, Forest and Senac, 2017).
Irrespective of any arguments, same-sex marriage should be legal because it is a fundamental human right.
Arguments made against this form of marriage, such as that it undermines traditional marriages, are based on opinions and not facts. Same-sex marriage should be legal because it is a fundamental human right.
Moreover, it is not important for a child to have a father and a mother because there are other places in which they actively interact with people of different sexes. Body Paragraph 1: Same-sex marriage provides legal rights protection to same sex couples on such matters as taxes, finances, and health care.Same-sex marriage is defined as a marriage or union between two people of the same sex, such as a man and a man.Some countries have broadened their perspective on this issue even though for many years, it has never been legally acknowledged, with some societies even considering it a taboo.First, same-sex marriage, if recognized by society, provides legal rights protection to same sex couples on such matters as taxes, finances, and health care.If people live together in a homosexual relationship without being legally married, they do not enjoy the security to protect what they have worked for and saved together.In case one of them dies, the surviving partner would have no right over the property under the deceased’s name even if they both funded its acquisition.Legalizing same-sex unions would cushion homosexual partners from such unfortunate situations.They would have the right to become heirs to their spouses and enjoy tax breaks just like heterosexual married couples.Legalization would also make it possible for them to purchase properties together, open joint accounts, and sign documents together as couples (Winter, Forest and Senac, 2017).Moreover, they fail to recognize that traditions and religions should not be used against same sex couples because there are people who do not ascribe to any tradition(s) or religions.Conclusion Same sex marriage is a human right that should be enjoyed just like traditional heterosexual marriages.