They ended up replicating between a third and half of the studies. It’s inevitable that studies won’t always be replicable—if every study could be replicated, then every researcher would be right the first time; even legitimate findings can prove fragile when you try to repeat them. It’s a huge problem: in 2010, an estimated two and a half million people in the United States sustained such an injury, and between 3.1 and 5.3 million were living with long-term, or even permanent, disability due to its effects. At this stage, the best predictor of your eventual outcome seems to be the severity of the injury, rather than any particular treatment you might receive. Rehabilitation therapy, especially therapy that requires demanding physical or mental activity, does seem to help patients regain function.“Best Friends and Better Coping: Facilitating Psychological Resilience Through Boys’ and Girls’ Closest Friendships,” from This study shows that even a single close friendship is valuable in protecting children—even the most vulnerable—against multiple psychological risk factors.
All the same, the paper concludes that there is “room for improvement” in psychology, especially when it comes to “cultural practices in scientific communication.” Specifically, the authors propose that “low-power research designs combined with publication bias favoring positive results together produce a literature with upwardly biased effect sizes.”In other words, the desire for novelty drives researchers to overestimate the conclusiveness of their own work. It’s not a new idea, but the research is an important empirical step forward.“Nonpharmacological Treatments of Insomnia for Long-Term Painful Conditions,” from Cognitive-behavioral therapy for insomnia!
Simplify this task by sorting out your analytical notes on questions or topics.
This will give you the opportunity to structure the information and decide what will be the plan of your written work.
Still, I gave it a shot—and here are the six papers I found most fascinating.“Estimating the Reproducibility of Psychological Science,” from This paper isn’t really a study; it’s the outcome of an important movement in the field of psychology. Some of the findings are surprising: if you’re female or Asian, you’re less likely to be given a psychotropic drug, regardless of evidence for its applicability.
In an effort called the Reproducibility Project, researchers at dozens of universities collaborated to replicate a hundred psychology studies that were initially conducted in 2008. Some are dispiriting: it turns out that we really don’t have a good sense of what works to treat these injuries, and a kitchen-sink-like approach remains the norm.
Having carefully reviewed the work, you can make the arguments more convincing, find the weaknesses of your work and turn them into strengths. They may be able to make useful comments or discover missed grammar and spelling mistakes.
Also, you can try to reread your work the next day if you have enough of time. If you have something to add even after you completed the work, don’t be afraid to edit your paper one more time.
This will help ensure that writing the task is not put off until the last minute and that you have time to pass it on according to the terms established by the supervisor.
Editing can include both changing ideas and corrections.