Tags: Get Homework AnswersEssay On Affirmative ActionEssay On FacebookEssay Vs Report StyleUsing Creative Writing And Literature In Mathematics ClassesBreaking Barriers EssayEffects Of Smoking Essay OutlineHomework Excuses FunnySeabiscuit Essay Questions
Using the two-peer editing system, students were challenged and prodded by differing points of view, which led them to improve their writing and revise to better reach a wide audience.For me, the Two-Peer Editing Strategy has advantages over the alternatives: a teacher-only reading, single-peer editing, and group-response editing.
" was "DULL." (Yes, he wrote it in capital letters.) He then made a few perfunctory comments and corrections throughout the essay.
Tara, the second reviewer, offered that she liked "the use of factual research," but suggested Amy "provide [more personal] reasons for [cheerleading to be considered] a sport." Tara wanted Amy to add emotion.
Her writing strategy was developed in response to having two peer editors review her first draft and make specific suggestions for improvement.
Her first reviewer, Ollie, remarked, "You need a better hook"; her second reviewer, Katie, suggested she cite others' experiences.
I also wanted to give my students a positive attitude about revision; I did not want them to have a "limited sense of revision," as students are often "very forgiving of papers having underdeveloped ideas and claims" (Beason, 1993, 395).
Most students do not think that their peers have the skills to be able to edit each other's essays (Helfers, et. Using the two-peer editing system, however, increased the likelihood that each paper would receive a quality response from at least one editor.Because Ruth had two reviewers' comments with which to work, her final essay was much more appealing than her first draft.The above exchange was one of many written conversations I witnessed when employing my Two-Peer Editing Strategy in my college composition class at the New Hampshire Community Technical College, in Nashua, New Hampshire.By: Denise Marchionda Publication: The Quarterly, Vol. 3 Date: 2004 Summary: Noting that the classroom logistics of peer response to writing can get dicey, Denise Marchionda developed a two-peer editing strategy for her college composition class.She describes her system in detail and shares the checklist she created to elicit productive discussion between the writer and reviewers.I wanted my students' writing to have an audience of at least two peer reviewers and myself.This is what I had them do: Although going through the peer review process twice was time consuming, it was time well spent.This frees up the student writers to experiment with new ideas, words, and patterns.They become aware of writing as a social construct and realize that their writing affects individual readers differently.Both reviewers helped Ruth see that what she wrote did not convey what she wanted her reader to understand.Ruth's original opening line on her first draft had read, "There is one state where assisted suicide is legal," and she then went on to explain why it was legal there.