Pearl Harbor Report Essay

Tags: Doctorate In Education No DissertationWaiting For Superman EssayEssay Voice GodEnglish Creative Writing IdeasEssay On Parents And RelationshipEssays On The Lovesong Of J Alfred PrufrockThesis On The Russian Moment In World HistoryProblem Solving MeaningT Shirt Business Plan Template

In 1995 Saddam Hussein’s son-in-law had informed the U. and the British that all biological, chemical, missile, and nuclear weapons had been destroyed under his direct supervision. In 1999 at a primary debate in New Hampshire, Bush said he’d “take out” Saddam Hussein. In 2001, Condoleezza Rice, Colin Powell, and others in the Bush Administration were telling the media that Saddam Hussein had no weapons.

They transparently switched their views on command.

The battleship USS Nevada (BB-36) is beached in the left-center distance.

(US Navy/Public Domain)earl Harbor Day today is like Columbus Day 50 years ago.

Believers in Pearl Harbor imagine for their mythical event, in contrast to today, a greater U. innocence, a purer victimhood, a higher contrast of good and evil, and a total necessity of defensive war making. The United States government did not need to make Japan a junior partner in imperialism, did not need to fuel an arms race, did not need to support Nazism and fascism (as some of the biggest U. corporations did right through the war), did not need to provoke Japan, did not need to join the war in Asia or Europe, and was not surprised by the attack on Pearl Harbor.

Pearl Harbor Report Essay

For support of each of these statements, keep reading. thinking the 2003-2008 period of the decades-long war on Iraq is somehow worse than World War II.The White House war schemers and their collaborators forged documents, solicited desired claims rejected by their own experts, relied on non-credible witnesses, fed fake evidence to complicit so-called journalists, and tortured desired statements out of victims they’d kidnapped.Bush concocted harebrained schemes to start a war that he publicly claimed to be trying to avoid. But just the fact that the British had been informed that war was inevitable by July 23, 2002, ought to have been a big story in May 2005. The destroyer USS Shaw (DD-373) is burning in the floating dry dock YFD-2 in the left distance. Navy battleship USS California (BB-44) slowly sinking alongside Ford Island, Pearl Harbor, Hawaii (USA), as a result of bomb and torpedo damage, 7 December 1941.“New Pearl Harbors” are longed for by war makers, claimed, and exploited.Yet the original Pearl Harbor remains the most popular U. argument for all things military, including the long-delayed remilitarization of Japan—not to mention the WWII internment of Japanese Americans as a model for targeting other groups today.Bush wanted to remove Saddam, through military action, justified by the conjunction of terrorism and WMD.But the intelligence and facts were being fixed around the policy.”And so they were, as has been documented in extensive detail.So, when the Downing Street Minutes came out on May 1, 2005, we jumped on it, not as new information but as evidence we could use, both to persuade others and to make a case in court or in Congress.These were the minutes of a meeting at Prime Minister Tony Blair’s office on July 23, 2002, at which his head of so-called intelligence, just back from Washington, reported (as summarized in the minutes):“Military action was now seen as inevitable.


Comments Pearl Harbor Report Essay

The Latest from ©