In Mill’s philosophy, moral goals entail impartiality where individuals believe that if a good deed is done to the other person, it can be reciprocated back to him or her at the time of need.
Considering this notion, morality of rational individuals is concerned with the maximization of the overall human happiness (Rachels & Rachels, 2010).
In this case, Emmanuel Kant adopted the categorical imperative theory, which defines the nature of moral obligation based on the concept of responsibility.
He asserted that importance of moral responsibility is attributed to categorical imperatives.
This is a philosophy that encourages impartiality beyond prudence.
As a result, prudence demands that people consider every event in their lives as being similar and attempt to get satisfaction from their lives.
This implies that categorical imperatives are the root cause of moral judgment and they form a measure by which any other form of moral status can be assessed in the society. Thus, a human being can seek to attain justified ends by using appropriate means in various undertakings.
In this case, ends associated with physical needs provide the basic form of theorized importance.
This entails the derivation of concepts out of what reason can inform us and not out of what is known from experience.
In this regard, conclusions can be used in addition to other experiences.