As the son of one of the four Los Angeles-based FBI agents -- Ahern, Benjamin, Moorehead, and North -- who identified James Earl Ray as King's assassin, I was taught that everyone deserves the protection of the law. He regarded other men's words just as he regarded other men's wives: as ripe for the taking. It is discussed in detail by Theodore Pappas, who wrote a book about it: The Martin Luther King, Jr., Plagiarism Story (Rockford, Illinois: Rockford Institute, 1994). The large number of plagiarized sources in everything King wrote and preached, from the beginning of his career, is visible in volume 1 of his Papers (Berkeley: University of California Press, 1992); the plagiarized originals appear in the footnotes.Tags: Essay Reasons WhyEssays By MontaigneAcademic Suspension Readmission EssayEssay About The Legend Of Sleepy HollowShort Essay On Anti Corruption MovementEssay On Why You Admire SomeoneWriting A Literary Analysis EssayRandom House Creative Writing CompetitionBeginning An Essay
The earliest warning that King was a plagiarist came from Ira Zepp, in an unpublished story, which revealed that sections of King's book, Stride Towqard Freedom, had been lifted from books written by two theologians. The publication of this volume was delayed for many years because of this public relations problem.
His plagiarism includes his Nobel Prize lecture, his "I have a Dream" speech, and his "Letter from a Birmingham Jail." One biographer called this activity "ghostwriting." (Note: authors pay ghostwriters for their work. The response of the academic community and the media indicates that liberals' icons are not allowed to be publicly embarrassed, in life or posthumously.
stood in front of the cameras and crowds as a public example of the better angels of our nature.
In private, however, King was of a very different character.
Theodore Pappas has written a piece for Chronicles magazine that should be required reading for every journalism student and journalist.
It tells the story of how the media, including book publishers, tried to suppress the story of how famed civil rights leader Dr.
A Boston University committee met to review the case in 1991, and found significant “authorship issues” with the dissertation, but advised against revoking the late Dr. They did, however, attach a letter to the paper with a summary of their findings, which remains there to this day.
King was under a lot of pressure when he wrote that dissertation.
Writing in the New Republic magazine, Charles Babington would later reveal that the Washington Post, the New York Times and the New Republic itself all had known the facts about King's plagiarism but refused to publish them.
The Times eventually did cover the issue but in a subsequent editorial suggested that the plagiarism was somehow comparable to a politician using a ghost writer for speeches.