The period also saw branded cosmetics rise to prominence, with long-established and well-advertised brands, such as Pears’ Soap, providing one of the few indicators of likely quality and safety.Tags: Generation Y Research PaperHigh School Structure EssayJstor Research PapersCritical Review ThesisGods Must Crazy EssaysTwins Research PaperThesis Future Work SectionEssay ImproverApollo 13 Essay
In her book, Matthews David tells how she bought a vintage container of the American face powder “Tetlow’s Swan Down” that dates from the 1870s.
It had been marketed as harmless and claimed to use whitening zinc oxide powder to replace once common toxic products such as lead, arsenic and bismuth.
Consider lipstick, which is placed directly on the thin skin of the lips, readily ingested throughout wear, and reapplied multiple times throughout the day.
Manufacturers are not required to list lead as an ingredient in lipsticks as it is regarded as a contaminant, but most contain lead, and some colours in much higher concentrations.
The tonic is described in one Queen advertisement as harmless and invisible: “It is not a cosmetic as it does not show on the face after application”.
Is Beauty More Than Skin Deep Essays
However, the reality was that Ruppert’s product was dangerous.
This lack of government oversight meant that manufacturers could bottle and sell almost anything without having to verify their claims, subject their products to the rudimentary testing that was available, or clearly label the ingredients.
The key way in which American and British consumers made their decisions about products was based on the claims made and reputations built in extensive magazine advertising, which became prolific in the late 19th century.
She had the powder tested with modern methods and found that it contained “a significant amount of lead”, which could be inhaled as dust during application.
The serious regulation of patent medicines and cosmetics did not occur until the 20th century.