Tags: How To Solve Free Fall ProblemsHow To Bind A DissertationHow Do You Reference A ThesisRubrics For Scoring EssaysGang Violence ThesisModern Research Paper TopicsBusiness Continuity Plan Best PracticesImpact Factor Of Research PaperPublizierte Dissertationen
With regard to the problem of defining terrorism, the dominant approach seeks to acknowledge the core meaning “terrorism” has in common use. Many definitions highlight the experience of terror or fear as the proximate aim of that violence.Neither violence nor terror is inflicted for its own sake, but rather for the sake of a further aim such as coercion, or some more specific political objective.All this tends to get in the way of sustained rational discussion of the nature and moral standing of terrorism and the best ways of coping with it.
Accordingly, the Jacobins applied the term to their own actions and policies quite unabashedly, without any negative connotations.
Yet the term “terrorism” and its cognates soon took on very strong negative connotations.
Consequentialists propose to judge terrorism, like everything else, in light of its consequences.
Nonconsequentialists argue that its moral status is not simply a matter of what consequences, on balance, terrorism has, but is rather determined, whether solely or largely, by what it is.
But there are also definitions that sever the conceptual connection of terrorism with violence or with terror.
With regard to the moral standing of terrorism, philosophers differ both on how that is to be determined and what the determination is.
Before the terrorist attacks in the United States on 11 September 2001, the subject of terrorism did not loom large in philosophical discussion.
Philosophical literature in English amounted to a few monographs and a single collection of papers devoted solely, or largely, to questions to do with terrorism.
While social sciences study the causes, main varieties, and consequences of terrorism and history traces and attempts to explain the way terrorism has evolved over time, philosophy focuses on two fundamental—and related—questions. The second is moral: Can terrorism ever be morally justified?
Philosophers have offered a range of positions on both questions.