Cherishing human life is something that should always be a value to anybody, one can argue that the actions of whoever committed the crime were so bad that they deserve this penalty no matter how much their life is equal to any one of us.
Cherishing human life is something that should always be a value to anybody, one can argue that the actions of whoever committed the crime were so bad that they deserve this penalty no matter how much their life is equal to any one of us.Tags: Scientific Research PapersA 500 Word EssayWho Is To Blame For The Cold War EssayLaboratory Business PlanEvent Planning BusinessesEnglish Literature Quotes Personal StatementTeen Discrimination EssayMarijunua Legalization EssayWhat Are Your Long Term Goals Essay
At any given moment, virtually all states differ in political and social attitudes, police funding and activities, and in the detailed operation of their respective criminal justice processes.
The temporary imposition of a well publicized death penalty moratorium in a given jurisdiction provides a better quasi-controlled experiment, particularly when demographic factors remain relatively stable over the sample period.
The so called side-by-side studies that purport not to reveal any deterrent effect (for example comparing death penalty enforcing state A with non-death penalty state B over the same time frame) fail to normalize for demographic differences.
There are always higher crime prone sub-populations in any geographic area.
This could be interesting to take into consideration since it defends the principle that we should protect innocent people.
In this case, one would have to look at whether or not saving the life of many is a good reason to kill someone who is most likely a criminal.
Psychiatrists, who may or may not specialize in legal work, are called on to participate in capital punishment cases at several points in the legal process.
For instance, their opinions may be requested in the determination of fitness to stand trial, and on mental state at the time of the crime, particularly in connection with the insanity defense.
After a declaration of guilt they may be involved in the sentencing process, where questions as to mitigating circumstances will often be about mental stress and psychological history.
They are also asked to predict future dangerousness and the possibility of rehabilitation.