in trying to get something for themselves and their families.” For much of her life, Grenville did not question this family folklore.
in trying to get something for themselves and their families.” For much of her life, Grenville did not question this family folklore.But walking across the Sydney Harbour Bridge for Reconciliation in the year 2000, she exchanges a glance with an Aboriginal woman and imagines their ancestors meeting 200 years before.
Corrupt and underhand methods to earn money only demean and dehumanize a man and peace of mind eludes such a man.
So, if a man leads a simple, honest life, and is hard working, he can really live a happy life.
Hard work is rightly said to be the key to success.
One can find real happiness in work and nowhere else.
Should it be historians or novelists, Indigenous or non-Indigenous storytellers?
Where historian Inga Clendinnen criticised Grenville for framing fiction as history, actress and director Rachael Maza has recently challenged playwright Andrew Bovell’s representation of Aboriginal experience.
He needs money to buy food, clothes and other necessary articles.
The most important thing is that man should earn money through honest means only.
Grenville wanted to understand Thornhill’s actions, and by proxy, the actions of many settlers. Though it confronts hidden stories, The Secret River has been criticised for having its own blind spots.
When the novel was first published, historians – most fervently Clendinnen, writing in Quarterly Essay – charged Grenville with conflating fiction and history, and excluding the voices of her Aboriginal characters.