Neither of the film versions had Paris at the Capulet tomb when Romeo arrives there to look at Juliets body.
In the scene where Romeo is in Mantua, instead of having the Friar ride a horse to Mantua to give Romeo the letter, the Friar sends the letter UPS. Once because he was in his backyard hitting rocks and the other time because the UPS man was walking up to Romeos’ door when Romeo drove past him in the car.
These two films had many differences but they had some things in common.
The Films of Franco Zeffirelli versus Baz Luhbrmann's Version of Romeo and Juliet Two films, both alike in content, set in fair Verona, where the directors laid out their scene, one created by Franco Zeffirelli in 1968 and the other by Baz Luhbrmann in 1996.
Both cinematic, both staying true to the plot and dialogue, each one radically different than the other, Zeffirelli sets his film within historical actuality, while Luhbrmann presents his with a modern twist.
Their adaptations of a stage play to a film, allowed them to interpret the story differently.
In comparing these films, one must first look at the chorus, (the first character introduced in Shakespeare's Romeo and Juliet.) Zeffirelli use of the chorus, is subtle (when compared to Luhbrmann's chorus), he employs a series of shot of Verona accompanied by a voiceover.
The story of Romeo and Juliet will always be around and will always be a main part of the writing world.
Without Shakespeares’ Romeo and Juliet the meaning of love and fate would still be lost.
The dialogue in both of the versions was based on the dialogue that Shakespeare used when he wrote the play.
The producers decided which lines were the least important and left those lines out of their movie. During the scene when Romeo was going to talk to the Friar about getting married, the 1967 film left out the speech about the power of plants that was spoken by the Friar.