Unlike source 3, source 1 has used statistics in there article to back up there statement:”30% of the UK’s greenhouse gas emission”.
Source 1 has used statistics in there article as this makes there text sound more athourative and accurate, since they are backing all of their views and stresses that meat is effecting our everyday life, this enables the reader to understand that “turning vegetarian“ can save our planet and can have a huge benefit to us, soon the reader gains trust in the article and may even support there views.
For example the source 1 is an article, they have used rhetorical question: “one day off the red stuff?
” The writer has used this technique as it grabs the reader’s attention and makes there reader feel like the text is specifically for them, since the article is showing concern for our planet which is everyone’s home, so everyone can relate, and using the phrase “stuff” instead of meat gives the meat no purpose as its now effecting our planets well-being.
You are going to compare the use of language in two texts, one of which you have chosen.
4 Compare the ways in which language is used for effect in the two texts. (16 marks) Similarly both source 1 and source 3 use rhetorical questions to grip there readers attention, for different purposes.You can also use the techniques in the exam too (Questions 5 & 6).For the exam, my teacher insisted we used PEARL for questions 1 - 4.I know my two creative writing pieces are both at 8/10 and they are 15% of my overall grade but I don't know any of my other marks!What kind of grades were you getting for speaking and listening?In comparison to source 1, source 3 uses a list:” donkeys, cars, carts with long-bearded gnome-like men”.Source 3 has used the list as this sounds rather catchy and leaves a long lasting effect on the reader as this information sticks in to the readers head, as they enjoy the extreme experience of the writer as she travels to Mediterranean , this gives the reader a thrilling insight of what she saw and had experienced.You don’t need to send us the mark/grade again, just submit a carry forward request by the submission deadline for the component.This document will show you how: How to request carry forward It is vital that you keep the same UCI that was used for the original attempt.Whereas source 1 has used an emotive phrase: “climate change” this is used to gain an emotional response from the readers, as they are the main audience to this article as the “climate” has an effect on everyone therefore the readers will have a concern and will feel the stress climbing through as they acknowledge how badly they are damaging the world , they feel a sense of regret and guilt for putting the planet through so many life changing processes that will damage everything.Students wishing to carry forward marks should be entered as normal using the standard entry codes.